Explanation of VAR situations (9th match day)

Thursday, 7 November 2024

NEA SALAMINA –ENP  minute 14rd    

REFEREE'S INITIAL DECISION: PLAY ON - GOAL

VAR: RECOMMENDED AN OFR

REFEREE’S DECISION AFTER VAR INTERVENTION: DEFENDING DIRECT FREE KICK

EXPLANATION:AN ATTACKER, PRIOR TO GOAL SCORED, HANDLED THE BALL AND PASSED IT TO HIS TEAM MATE WHO SCORED THE GOAL. THE  VAR CORRECTLY RECOMMENDED AN OFR FOR ATTACKING HANDBALL. THE REFEREE, AFTER OFR, MADE A CORRECT DECISION.  

OMONIA NICOSIA – OMONIA29 minute 45th +4    

REFEREE'S INITIAL DECISION: PLAY ON    

VAR: RECOMMENDED AN OFR

REFEREE’S DECISION AFTER VAR INTERVENTION: DIRECT FREE KICK – RED CARD FOR SERIOUS FOUL PLAY

EXPLANATION: A PLAYER COMMITTED A FOUL WITH THE STUDS, HIGH POINT OF CONTACT, HIGH INTENSITY AND SPEED, ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF HIS OPPONENT, SO ALL THE CRITERIA ARE MET FOR SERIOUS FOUL WHICH IS PUNISHED WITH THE RED CARD. GOOD AND CORRECT VAR INTERVENTION. 

OMONIA NICOSIA – OMONIA 29 minute 67h      

REFEREE'S INITIAL DECISION: PENALTY KICK 

VAR: CONFIRMED REFERE’S DECISION

EXPLANATION: THE BALL WHICH WAS CROSSED INSIDE THE  PENALTY AREA HIT DEFENDER’S ARM. THE REFERE SPOTTED THE INCIDENT AND AWARDED THE PENALTY KICK.

ETHNIKOS – KARMIOTISSA minute 77th

REFEREE'S INITIAL DECISION:PENALTY KICK

VAR: CONFIRMED REFEREE’S DECISION  

EXPLANATION: DURING THE CHALLENGE BETWEEN TWO PLAYERS, ONE FROM EACH SIDE, A DEFENDER MADE A CLEAR MOVEMENT WITH HIS ARM AND TOUCHED THE BALL. THE PENALTY KICK WAS CORRECTLY AWARDED.

ETHNIKOS – KARMIOTISSA minute 90th +5

REFEREE'S INITIAL DECISION:PLAY ON

VAR: RECOMMENDED AN OFR

REFEREE’S DECISION AFTER VAR INTERVENTION: DIRECT FREE KICK – RED CARD FOR SERIOUS FOUL PLAY

EXPLANATION:A PLAYER WITH A LEG HIGH IN THE AIR KICKED THE OPPONENT’S HEAD. THE REFEREE FAILED TO RECORGNIZE THIS, BUT THE VAR CORRECTLY INTERVENED AND THE REFEREE AFTER OFR MADE A CORRECT DECISION – RED CARD FOR SERIOUS FOUL PLAY.

ETHNIKOS – KARMIOTISSA minute 7th 

REFEREE'S INITIAL DECISION:PLAY ON

VAR: CONFIRMED REFEREE’S DECISION

EXPLANATION:AN ATTACKER INSTEAD OF THE BALL HIT THE DEFENDER’S LEG. THE DEFENDER DIDN’T DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL IN HIS MOVEMENT SO FOUL HAD NOT BEEN COMMITTED. EVEN IF THERE WAS A POSSIBLE FOUL, THE ATTACKER WAS IN AN OFFSIDE POSITION SO AN INDIRECT FREE KICK WOULD HAVE BEEN AWARDED. 

Επόμενοι Αγώνες

Copyright © 2018 CFA | Privacy policy - Terms of Use - Cookie Policy | Developed and Hosted by Change your consent